Differences in AFAB and AMAB Cross-Gender Exploration and Transition

Note: Since writing this post I have learned that the use of AMAB and AFAB to categorize people, especially nonbinary people, is exclusionary, reductive, and often not helpful in describing experiences in an accessible way. I am working to stop using these terms. I have chosen to leave this post up for now. If you feel strongly about what is written here please leave a comment or send me an email. I appreciate your input.


Historically in society the default has generally been masculine. This is slowly changing but is still true in a lot of ways. One of the main ways this is brought to my attention on a regular basis is that it is deemed appropriate for women to present in a more masculine way but it is not ok for men to present in a feminine way. The ‘androgynous ideal’ is often seen as someone with short hair and a flat chest both of which are typically masculine aspects of appearance.

AFAB people 

exploring your masculinity or trying to decrease your femininity

Pros

  • You can explore your gender and presentation without having to justify it as much.
  • Cis women who prefer an androgynous or masculine presentation are fairly easily accepted by society.

Cons

  • Your efforts to express a more masculine or less feminine gender will be seen as changes to your presentation only and will not necessarily be seen as a reflection of your gender. Therefore, people will not necessarily adjust the language they apply to you or your gender category until you explicitly come out.
  • You may have to over-masculinize to feel like it is having an impact on how people see and interact with you.

As an AFAB person exploring my mostly neutral but somewhat fluctuating gender and trying to present more masculine at times to reflect that, this has definitely been my experience.

AMAB people

exploring your femininity or trying to decrease your masculinity

Pros

  • Once you are ready to come out it will only take a few minor changes in your presentation for society to start questioning your gender and applying new language to you.
  • You will not need to overly-feminize (unless you want to) in order for society to take notice.

Cons

  • It is very difficult for you to explore your gender without society noticing and potentially putting yourself in a dangerous situation
  • Cis men who want to explore or express their femininity have difficulty doing so without having their gender identity questioned.

This leads to AFAB people having difficulty gaining male privilege because they are still deemed female no matter how masculine they present and AMAB people losing male privilege very easily as soon as they present slightly feminine.

For those people who are interested in undergoing medical transition there are distinct differences in experience with certain aspects of transition due to society’s specifications of how they identify someone as female or male at a glance.

AFAB people

attempting to be read by society as male

Pros

  • Male puberty overrides female puberty so taking Testosterone results in slow but effective changes to allow you to ‘pass’ as male fairly easily (voice lowering, growing facial hair, building muscle, body fat redistribution).

Cons

  • Producing the appearance of a flat chest is very difficult either by wearing a binder which is uncomfortable at best and injuring at worst, or surgery which has a difficult recovery and leaves obvious scars.
  • Surgery to relieve dysphoria associated with genitalia or provide a sense of physical euphoria or completeness has a high rate of complication and may require an extensive skin graft again resulting in visible scarring while providing minimal benefit for sexual function.
AMAB People

attempting to be read by society as female

Pros

  • Producing the appearance of breasts is fairly easy, either with breast forms and a bra or through a well refined surgery for breast augmentation if hormones do not produce the desired effect.
  • Surgery to relieve dysphoria associated with genitalia or provide a sense of physical euphoria or completeness, while still having a fairly high risk of complication, also is highly effective.

Cons

  • Because male puberty trumps female puberty, starting Estrogen after completing male puberty does not reverse the effects (facial and body hair continues to grow, voice remains lower) and though some breast tissue may develop, it is not always enough to provide the appearance of a typically female chest.

Caveat: The pros/cons related to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) will differ if you’re on hormone blockers prior to the start of puberty.

This all results in trans men ‘passing’ more easily but potentially having ongoing physical dysphoria or visible scarring as a result of surgery and trans women having difficulty ‘passing’ but having effective surgical options if desired.

These are my own observations during my husband’s transition from female to male, my experiences as an AFAB genderqueer person, and listening to other trans people’s experiences. If your experiences match or differ from these observations please leave a comment below!

3 thoughts on “Differences in AFAB and AMAB Cross-Gender Exploration and Transition”

  1. Being married to a trans woman and having had a number of transfeminine friends, I noticed some differences between what I have noticed and what you have said above.

    I’ve seen many many cases of a feminine-presenting AMAB person being called ‘sir’, even when wearing long hair, make up, nail polish, a dress, and either natural or artificial breasts. It is shockingly difficult to get people to see you as female if you have facial features they interpret as masculine.

    I don’t have any statistics but it seems very common for hormones to be all that is required to grow breasts of the desired size. I don’t think chest surgery is required very often, but of course I could be wrong.

    I’m enjoying your blog so far! Great work!

    1. Yes! I have also noticed this! The facial features, deeper voice, and sometimes adam’s apple seem very strong triggers for labeling someone as male regardless of all the other aspects of their presentations. Good point!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *